<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expected Returns</title>
	<link>http://www.financialreference.com/blog/2006/03/26/expected-returns/</link>
	<description>Musings of a Financial Hobbyist</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Expected Returns by: 1mill_by_35</title>
		<link>http://www.financialreference.com/blog/2006/03/26/expected-returns/#comment-302</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.financialreference.com/blog/2006/03/26/expected-returns/#comment-302</guid>
					<description>financialreference, 

I agree with you 10% is aggressive. I've theorized 8-10%, so 10% at the high end. However, remeber GDP growth is generally consistent the revenue growth of the market. Since companies have both financial and operating leverage and earnings grow from a smaller base, you can get 10% earnings growth at lower GDP/revenue growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>financialreference, </p>
	<p>I agree with you 10% is aggressive. I&#8217;ve theorized 8-10%, so 10% at the high end. However, remeber GDP growth is generally consistent the revenue growth of the market. Since companies have both financial and operating leverage and earnings grow from a smaller base, you can get 10% earnings growth at lower GDP/revenue growth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
