<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bull Case for Stocks</title>
	<link>http://www.financialreference.com/blog/2005/09/20/the-bull-case-for-stocks/</link>
	<description>Musings of a Financial Hobbyist</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Bull Case for Stocks by: kocaar</title>
		<link>http://www.financialreference.com/blog/2005/09/20/the-bull-case-for-stocks/#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.financialreference.com/blog/2005/09/20/the-bull-case-for-stocks/#comment-24</guid>
					<description>You might want to take a look at where the S&amp;#38;P would be without the run up in the energy sector...

The focus on inflation has been on the &quot;Core rate&quot;.  People are quick to take energy out of the inflation equation but don't do so on the returns side.  The S&amp;#38;P 500 would have lost over 7% this year without the gains made in energy.  

This is a double edge that I don't think a lot of people see.  Yes it would be nice to see oil come down but there may be less up side to the market than people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You might want to take a look at where the S&amp;P would be without the run up in the energy sector&#8230;</p>
	<p>The focus on inflation has been on the &#8220;Core rate&#8221;.  People are quick to take energy out of the inflation equation but don&#8217;t do so on the returns side.  The S&amp;P 500 would have lost over 7% this year without the gains made in energy.  </p>
	<p>This is a double edge that I don&#8217;t think a lot of people see.  Yes it would be nice to see oil come down but there may be less up side to the market than people think.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
